Current:Home > MarketsJustice Department asks court to pause order limiting Biden administration's contacts with social media companies-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Justice Department asks court to pause order limiting Biden administration's contacts with social media companies
View Date:2024-12-23 18:17:40
Washington — The Justice Department on Thursday asked a federal court to put on hold its order blocking Biden administration officials from communicating with social media companies while it appeals the decision.
In a filing in support of its request for a stay, federal prosecutors said the preliminary injunction issued by U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty on Tuesday sweeps too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct it allows and who it covers.
The order, they said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The Justice Department warned that the injunction, which names entire agencies like the Departments of Justice and Health and Human Services, causes "significant confusion" as to who is temporarily barred from working with social media companies.
"The potential breadth of the entities and employees covered by the injunction combined with the injunction's sweeping substantive scope will chill a wide range of lawful government conduct relating to [the administration's] law enforcement responsibilities, obligations to protect the national security, and prerogative to speak on matters of public concern," prosecutors said.
The preliminary injunction granted by Doughty, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, blocks a number of top Biden administration officials — among them Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre — from engaging in a range of communications with social media companies.
The administration officials are temporarily prohibited from working with the companies in ways that are aimed at "urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner for removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech."
The order lists several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
The Justice Department swiftly notified the court that it intends to appeal Doughty's decision.
The injunction stemmed from a lawsuit filed by the Republican attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri in 2022 that alleged senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, President Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
The Biden administration, however, said that it often spoke publicly and privately with social media companies to promote its message on public health and safety during the COVID-19 pandemic, identify potential threats to the integrity of elections and flag misinformation spreading on platforms.
Additionally, much of the conduct alleged occurred during the Trump administration, the Justice Department wrote in a May filing.
"The Constitution preserves the Government's right to encourage specific private behavior, such as joining a war effort, stopping the sale of cigarettes to children, and — in this case — reducing the spread of misinformation that undermines election security or the nation's efforts to protect the public from the spread of a deadly disease," Justice Department lawyers told the court. "A social media company's independent decision to follow the Government's urgings does not transform the company's conduct into government action."
But in an opinion granting the states' request for an injunction, Doughty said they were likely to succeed on the merits of their claims that the Biden administration's efforts violated the First Amendment.
"Using the 2016 election and the COVID-19 pandemic, the Government apparently engaged in a massive effort to suppress disfavored conservative speech," he wrote.
veryGood! (9953)
Related
- Oprah Winfrey Addresses Claim She Was Paid $1 Million by Kamala Harris' Campaign
- 'This is completely serious': MoonPie launches ad campaign targeting extraterrestrials
- House set for key vote on Biden impeachment inquiry as Republicans unite behind investigation
- Dead, 52-foot-long fin whale washes up at a San Diego beach, investigation underway
- Love Is Blind’s Chelsea Blackwell Reacts to Megan Fox’s Baby News
- Lawsuit challenges Alabama inmate labor system as ‘modern day slavery’
- Vikings bench Joshua Dobbs, turn to Nick Mullens as fourth different starting QB this season
- A Florida woman, a 10-year-old boy and a mother of 2 are among Tennessee tornado victims
- Beyoncé has released lots of new products. Here's a Beyhive gift guide for the holidays
- Argentina devalues its currency and cuts subsidies as part of shock economic measures
Ranking
- The View's Sara Haines Walks Off After Whoopi Goldberg's NSFW Confession
- Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes Are Avoiding Toxic Gossip Amid Their Exes' New Romance
- Horoscopes Today, December 12, 2023
- Lawsuit challenges Alabama inmate labor system as ‘modern day slavery’
- 'We suffered great damage': Fierce California wildfire burns homes, businesses
- Sri Lanka will get the second tranche of a much-need bailout package from the IMF
- 'Love is Blind' Season 6 premiere date announced: When do new episodes come out?
- Donald Trump’s lawyers again ask for early verdict in civil fraud trial, judge says ‘no way’
Recommendation
-
A wayward sea turtle wound up in the Netherlands. A rescue brought it thousands of miles back home
-
Oprah Winfrey talks passing baton in The Color Purple adaptation: You have taken it and made it yours
-
Multiple injuries reported in nighttime missile attack on Ukrainian capital
-
What to do if someone gets you a gift and you didn't get them one? Expert etiquette tips
-
Firefighters make progress, but Southern California wildfire rages on
-
Multiple injuries reported in nighttime missile attack on Ukrainian capital
-
Former Iowa deputy pleads guilty in hot-vehicle death of police dog
-
North Carolina officer who repeatedly struck woman during arrest gets 40-hour suspension